Tuesday, 19 May 2015

LOL: Bizarre, Paranoid, Email from UKIP's Alan Bigwood to a Potential Christian Voter

In April a friend - tired of Nigel Farage and UKIP bollocking on about Christian values and beliefs wrote to UKIP seeking to find out whether Nigel himself actually went to church. It was a fairly straightforward request (see below). However, in typical style, the reply from UKIP's Alan Bigwood was anything but. His bizarre conspiracy laden ramble of half truth, no truth and downright lie reveals much about a party that claims to be progressive and liberal but is in fact anything but.

Between the Marxist conspiracies and Urban myths,  perhaps the most telling thing of all is that Bigwood fails to actually answer the question at all.


To UKIP Head Office

Z** P*******

To: mail@ukip.org
Hi There

It's been so refreshing to see UKIP actively seek the Christian vote and to try to put in place policies that will directly appeal to followers of Christ. 

I am a former Conservative voter who became disenchanted with David Cameron after his comments in which he said his faith "came and went". I and my husband C****  are now both actively considering voting UKIP. Can you just confirm for me that Nigel himself is an active church goer and where does he go to church?

Thank you and Gods Blessings Upon You

Z** and C****



UKIP Head Office <mail@ukip.org>
Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:25 PM
To: Z*** P********* *******@gmail.com>
Dear Z** & C****,

Many thanks for getting in touch with us, and for your support. UKIP is firmly in favour of maintaining our culture and our heritage, and an integral part of that is of course the recognition of the huge impact that Christianity has had (sometimes with mixed results, it's true) upon our history for probably the last 1,200 years.


UKIP was the only Party to oppose Gay Marriage and although that political battle has been lost in the House of Commons, we are the only Party that is still seriously concerned about the (inevitable) pressure regarding Gay Marriage that will be exerted onto schools and churches, if they don't "toe the line" and start teaching that traditional ideas of Marriage are outdated and "so Last Century". The trouble with "progressives" is that they are so far out in front that they lose contact with everyone else, and they even come to think that it is incumbent on everyone else to "catch up". But when they are leading the way over a cliff, "catching up" is not always a good plan.

I must also make the point that UKIP is the only Party that wants to pull out of the EU, and yet the EU's Constitution made absolutely zero mention of Christianity. The architecture of the Parliament building in Strasbourg was deliberately designed to represent the Tower of Babel, signifying "unfinished business".  This isn't some zany conspiracy theory.  The EU is quite open about it and makes no concealment of that.   Man is in charge, not God. They even point out the scaffolding bars (part of the structure) winding around at the top, ready for the next level, should Man choose to go up another storey.

The EU is secular, Marxist in origin, and a self-serving Customs Union.  One small  (actually large) example:  the West African (native) fishing industry in countries such as Mauretania, Senegal etc has pretty much been wrecked. Corrupt Governments all down the coast have sold off their Fishing Grounds to the EU Armada, which comes along, sweeps the seas clean, and disappears again, leaving a raped wasteland. The local fishermen are left standing open-mouthed on the seashore. Teach me to fish and I will live forever?

I am not sure what church Nigel attends but he often confirms his Christian belief.

Please see the attached 2015 manifesto.  The full 76-page version can be viewed at the UKIP website www.ukip.org

Regards
Alan Bigwood

UKIP Head Office 

Thursday, 7 May 2015

VE Day: Time To Stop Remembrance Of War And Celebrate The Legacy of Peace Instead



In the drawer next to my bed I have a plastic bag with my father's WW2 campaign medals in it. Given that I'm only in my mid forties this makes me fairly unusual I suppose. Indeed, growing up I barely knew anyone my age whose Dad had fought in the war and this was both a great source of pride and fear. Invariably the fear triumphed over the pride. Throughout my childhood, I had a recurring nightmare in which he was taken away to war again and didn't come back. My Uncle Charles was still in the forces in those days and had lost an eye and his sense of taste and smell at Tobruk, so it didn't seem so idiotic to imagine my Dad re-enlisting in the event of what felt, at the time, like the inevitable coming WW3. 

All of his closest chums were army chums. There was Tod, a fellow Sapper who had lost both his legs to a land mine and would take his artificial ones off and merrily throw them aside to go swimming; there was my godfather, Richard, who had won an MC in Italy and there was the irrepressible Basil, who had gone out with the BEF in 1939 and been lifted off Dunkirk beach in 1940.

Get them all together and there would be curry (Indian army officers) a bath full of booze and a cacophony of laughter. They were the most closely bonded, glorious, individuals I have ever known. They had seen adventure and seen death, they had feared death and often been half bored to death but they had all come through it together - and most importantly survived. They were kind, worldly and very, very funny. The very best vintage Englishmen.

As a boy, I would dress up in bits of Dad's old uniform and put on his Sam Browne belt and wage wars in my bedroom with plastic soldiers in which we the British always won and the grey little Germans were inevitably annihilated with toy building bricks and pillows. I would interrogate him for stories and always be a bit disappointed with his response.

Most disappointing of all was his insistence that he had never actually killed anyone. My father, a Royal Engineer, had been a forward intelligence officer, tasked with going ahead of his division and literally seeing how the land lay. It was dangerous work, but the key was stealth. He had dozens of stories of hiding in ditches, or meeting members of the Italian resistance, or holding his breath just yards from German troops - but boys of ten raised on Where Eagles Dare don't want that. They want their Dad to have blazed a machine gun, blown up a castle and taken out half the SS. 

Just once did he come literally face to face with the enemy. While trying to find a good crossing point over a river he looked up and saw a Wehrmacht officer on the other side doing just the same thing. Dad confessed that his instinct was to sneak away, but just then the enemy soldier saw him and so he pulled his gun and took a quick pot shot before running frantically away. Unable to sleep that night, he tossed and turned in his canvas bed, half hoping and half fearing that he had killed another human being. That snapshot, I suspect, is what real war was and is like for most people in the thick of it.

My father was a Tory of the old school. Pin striped suit and military tie, he would often have a far away look in his one eye and despite his fairly decent war record would always insist that he had 'done nothing'. He only wore his campaign medals once and that was in 1995 when he and his old pals marched down the Mall. He didn't like show offs and was suspicious of 'men wearing gongs'. He loved Britain but confessed often that during the war itself he had little time for Churchill. 

He was also firmly pro-European. He had fought for it after all. Dad loved Italy and Italian cars and food and wine - and women. He believed passionately in the EEC and campaigned for it. In fact that was a fairly consistent theme among his group of friends. There are those who say we only entered for economic reasons but that wasn't how he saw it. He would often say how lucky I was to be the first member of the male line in three generations not to have fought in a war. I was. I am.

All of those men are dead now. My father went when I was still in my twenties and his dear buddies faded away within just a few short years of each other. Am I proud? You bet your socks I am. And that is why, increasingly, I feel it is time to call the official commemorations of it all a day. 

You see, these celebrations, whether VE Day, or D Day or even the Blitz no longer have much to do with the people who fought, or suffered, or came through - or didn't. It has been appropriated by the media, the politicians, the pundits, the near right and the far right. Take Farage, a man who to the best of my knowledge has no family at all who participated in either war. How did he spend the election day morning? Posing by a war memorial for photographs. What is the implication of that? That as a nationalist British party UKIP somehow owns a piece of those that saved us from Nazism. No. You don't own the war dead Farage. They were left and right, liberal and Tory, straight and gay, good and bad. They were, after all, not heroes or 'Britons' but human beings. But more than that, what they have left us an extraordinary legacy. The longest sustained period of peace and prosperity in our history. I have not had to go and fight in another pointless war and with any luck the same will be true of my children and grandchildren. 



So after this year celebrating the end of the worst conflict in history let us all move on. We should and must remember it, we should study it and learn from it, but we must remember most of all that its true legacy is not marble columns and fluttering flags - but peace. Time to stop remembrance of war and start celebrating that instead.

Saturday, 2 May 2015

Royal baby BREAKING NEWS - your cut out and keep guide to the boring second by second coverage


Newsreader  
We now go live to our Royal Correspondent who is outside St Mary's Hospital. Nicholas/Sue/Dave what can you tell us?

Nicholas/Sue/ Dave  
Yes the Palace have confirmed that the Duchess of Cambridge is currently inside the hospital and given that she is nine months pregnant we can assume that she is probably going to have the baby in the next few hours, or days, or possibly a bit longer. This means that at some point, she will have a baby. The baby will almost certainly be a boy or a girl. If it is a boy there is an extremely high chance that he will be given the traditional title "Prince" whereas if it is a girl she will be known as "Princess". We don't know what the name of the baby will be at this point, but if it is a girl then we can reasonably assume that the baby will have a girl's name, while if the child is a boy he will be called something male. I can also confirm that even if he is a boy he will not be called George. He or she will be the fourth in line to the throne and remain so until something changes at which point he or she will become the third in line or even second or conversely the fifth or sixth. Or perhaps even the seventh. Or eighth - it really depends on how many other children members of the Royal Family have.

Newsreader
And do we have any suggestion as to what emotions the other members of the Royal Family have regarding this labour?

Nicholas/Sue/David
Yes at this point the Palace have confirmed that the Duchess of Cambridge is nine months pregnant and is inside the hospital. We know nothing more than that. In the past Prince William has said that he would love to have a little girl, but that he would be equally happy if he had another little boy. The Duchess herself has never commented openly on the topic, but one might reasonably assume that she will be happy with a boy or a girl. The couple have already had one child, Prince George, so we can say at this point that the new baby will almost certainly not be called George or even Georgina, although the latter still remains a possibility. If unlikely. The news was greeted around the world by other media outlets. Everybody is described as being "really delighted" by the news. Stephen Fry tweeted: "A baby will be coming soon that's nice" while Nigel Farage added - on twitter that it was "really important that everyone realised that we'd all be much better off under an Australian style points based system of labour." David Cameron, unusually perhaps, has backed Farage on this, while Ed Miliband  has added  that he was "very happy for the Royal Family but was trying to fight an election" and that maybe an airport could be named after the baby when it is born. Back to you in the studio Alistair.

Newsreader 
In other news thousands continue to die in ....

Roll Music and Credits.....

Wednesday, 22 April 2015

Why The Only Patriotic Approach Is To Ignore St George's Day Altogether


Ah it's here again. April the 23rd. The annual festival of angry commentators fulminating over a lack of English people running around getting drunk and venerating their Saint like what the Irish do. By 11 am Farage will have appeared on pretty much all the radio and TV outlets decreeing that under his watch, supersize flags will be flown from every town hall, a Bank Holiday will be declared and that everyone will be obliged to slay at least one dragon before tea.

Throughout the day news channels will try to fill out the tedium of election coverage by sending cub reporters to vicious pubs, full of tattooed angry men (who will mysteriously not be working) to get them to articulate what St George's Day means to them. Nobody will be able to do that, because I've never heard anyone eloquently express the logic of their blind patriotism. And drunk men in midday pubs are notoriously ineloquent. 

There'll be much twitter and Facebook talk by earnest liberals of how George was Turkish - or Greek and how he probably didn't even exist at all. A UKIP candidate will say something embarrassing, which will be reported gleefully in the Huffington Post. Somewhere in the Welsh hills Nick Griffin will think something bigoted. Other, well intentioned, pundits and politicians will try to sum up what it is to be English. And the whole thing will be, as it always is, a great big wet non-event. 

The good news is that all this is an absolute waste of time, because by far the most English thing to do is to ignore the whole tiresome borefest altogether. And here are 5 reasons why:
  • The primary reason that St George's Day is not celebrated much, never has been and never should be is that England is a Protestant Country. And Protestants don't "DO" saints because we banned their adoration around the time we dissolved the monasteries and burned all the Catholics for being heretics. Suggesting that we be more continental is always to be welcomed but are the flag-bearers of St George really suggesting that we overthrow the Head of State and Defender of the Faith and bow once more to the might of Rome?
  • Nobody believes in God anyway. Less than 20% of English people regularly attend church. If we don't believe in God why are we venerating a Saint that we didn't recognise even when we did?
  • In the England of old, it just wasn't done to shout about how great your nation was. The traditional Englishman, regardless of class, was by definition understated, quietly patriotic, proud and most definitely not brash. Bragging about the superiority of your race was the sort of thing 'continentals' did. Usually with disastrous results. Bertolt Brecht (who was of course continental himself) correctly observed that "unhappy (is) the land in need of heroes." And that's quite true. 
  • Which leads me neatly on to five:
  • Why do we need this probably fictional Turkish bloke who probably never slayed so much as a chicken when we've got a superb line-up of real people who actually lived that are much more deserving of our adulation? What good is lame old St George when we have - well David Bowie. And The Beatles. And David Hockney. Or Churchill. Or Shakespeare. Or Darwin, Newton, Woolf, Chaplin, Stan Laurel, Harold Pinter, Joe Orton, Cary Grant, Michael Caine, Stevie Smith, Queen Elizabeth I, Elton John, JK Rowling, JM Turner, Giles Gilbert Scott, Lutyens, Elgar, Ray Winstone, Michael Powell, Alfred Hitchcock, Tilda Swinton, Judi Dench, Francis Bacon, Christopher Marlowe, Bobby Moore, Fred Perry, Stirling Moss and - well The List goes on and on.
We English have much to be proud of. We have no need to wave the red and white flag out of the windows of our houses, or get drunk in Trafalgar Square. The former plays havoc with property prices and the latter we can and indeed do all the time anyway. That's one of the glorious things about being English. And gin. And a unified front on Noel Edmonds. But perhaps the greatest English tradition of all is to completely ignore our English traditions altogether. No stupid 'traditional dress' for us. No. We are just what we are. This happy breed. And that's good enough for me.

Thursday, 16 April 2015

The Greatest Speech Churchill Never Made

Of  all  the Great Britons it is perhaps Churchill who is most often attributed stuff he never said. From poisoning people's coffee to quipping about his member to Atlee, words the man never uttered have been tossed about for years, willy-nilly and used by dimwits to back up dimmer causes. Take the quote in the picture on the right. He never said that. It's attributed to everyone from Snoopy to Mark Twain. Hell - it could even have been said by Shania. But Winnie never said it. SO - time to put the record straight. After strenuous research (about half an hour on the train actually) I've managed to knock up a speech consisting entirely of unattributed or just plain made up Churchill quotes. Well - not quite - ONE of them is real. Can you spot which one? No Google allowed. Answer to @otto_english


Speech Given By Sir Winston S. Churchill to Nobody Ever, on no date in history:

Plans are of little importance, but planning is essential. Success concerns going from failure to failure without losing your enthusiasm. Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.  A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity while an optimist the opportunity in every difficulty. You must never, never, never give up. If you are going through hell keep going. If you have enemies then good, that means you've stood up for something in your life. 

People often forget, that in 1940 we had no guarantee that we would win the war but we did and to ensure it never happens again, we must build a United States of Europe. In this way only, will hundreds of millions of toilers be able to regain the simple joys and hopes which make life worth living again.

On a final note, in about sixty years from now, a man called Nigel will come among you and say a lot of things. Supporters of his might even take some of the things I never said and post them on a social media website called Twitter. Others may prefer to do so on Facebook. Or even Instagram. Vote for him. Why not. Oh - and drink Sunny Delight. It's delicious with a handful of crushed ice. Clemmie swears by the stuff.

Wednesday, 4 March 2015

"I want my country back" - The good old days of Jimmy Savile, knee-cappings and homes that killed you.






Anyone who has spent time arguing with Kippers on Twitter - and I confess here and now that I have spent FAR too much time doing just that - will realise that for many devotees of Nigel, one of the principle attractions of the "People's Army" is the hope that it will return the nation to a golden age. This sentiment is usually expressed with the punchy declaration that:

I want my country back.


Frankly, it's a bit of a theme.

So I've been looking closely, too closely perhaps, at pictures of the delegates at the UKIP Spring Conference and  wondering what that "country" is.  According to a YouGov poll the typical UKIP voter is male, over 50 and white. Studying the delegates in Margate, one would have to assume that the average "die-hard" supporter is a bit older than that and closer to the 60 mark.

I think we have to assume that "I want my country back" means they wish it returned some Back to The Future style fixed point in their youth. Otherwise it's a fairly redundant statement. So given their ages, one might suppose that they want to go back to when they were in the (Godfrey) bloom of their youth. For most, that would be the early 1970s. In the last fading rays of light before we entered the EUSSR - or whatever they're calling it today.

Ah. 1973. Gary Glitter was riding high in the charts with his Glam Rock hit "Touch Me". Popular Radio 1 DJ Jimmy Savile was encouraging us to "Clunk Click, even on the shortest trip". On TV, star family entertainer Stuart Hall was charming a nation with the hilarious "It's a Knockout". The IRA too were enjoying a "golden era" of bombings, knee cappings and sectarian shootings. Britain was in the grip of a splendid recession, replete with mass unemployment and widescale industrial unrest that was to last a decade. Oh, and Princess Anne married Captain Mark Phillips at Westminster Abbey - to much rejoicing.

Happy days.

If you had wanted to BUY BRITISH in 1973 you could have got yourself a lovely new Austin Allegro and been the envy of all your neighbours. Or had a newly built asbestos lined home that has probably killed you by now. The industry of course knew the dangers of asbestos in the seventies, but in those joyous pre EU regulation days it was still being merrily fitted to most new homes. 

The fact is actually - and please whisper it quietly lest our UKIP friends hear this - Britain was shit in the early 1970s. I mean really shit. Sure there was David Bowie and Nicolas Roeg but that really was it. Life expectancy was around 70. Racism and sexual abuse and sexism and (as we now know) paedophilia were rampant in a society that had yet to embrace political correctness - or as some call it - decency. It was still perfectly OK to eject people from your shop  or lodgings on the grounds of their colour or race. In the workplace in those pre Health and Safety GONE MAD days you were far, far more likely to die or suffer a serious injury. In schools, teachers could still beat your little ones with a cane. 

And they did.

If you had a baby out of wedlock you were still ashamed and made to feel really ashamed. If you had a boyfriend or girlfriend of a different colour you were pretty much ostracised. And heaven help you if you were gay. Sure - homosexuality had been decriminalised in 1967 - but it barely registered. Women's rights were a joke. Maternity leave didn't exist. Nor a minimum wage. If you got cancer you probably died. 

Thing is - UKIP is not really a political movement at all. It's a "mood". A party of people that genuinely think the past was better - despite all the evidence to the contrary - because in reality they are actually harking back to the loss of their own youth. It is a personal lament writ large in political form. 

Now come on everyone -  all together now

Monday, 5 January 2015

The New Meaninglessness



Several things inspired me to pick up my laptop today and write this. Prime among those was the fact that I love you. Yes. You heard me right. I fucking love you. I love you with a passion that defies time, space and - well just about everything in the Universe. And beyond. I know, I know, we've not even been introduced, but there it is.,..... I've said it. I love you. Your move. Whoever you are.

We'll come back to the details of our passion later, but just to warm you up for some serious love-making that'll *seal the deal* let's talk about Ed Miliband. You know you want to.

You see, Ed wants to talk to you. And me. And approximately 3,999,998 others in the run up to the General Election. Bet that makes you feel special. Certainly made me come over all gooey. Obviously, Ed won't be able to have ALL those conversations himself so his elves - sorry - party members - will be doing it for him. 

Thing is, the so called conversation won't be a conversation, because Ed's idea of a conversation seems to involve "telling people" what is at stake. And anyway that isn't the point, because unless you are a brain dead tulip, you will know that the whole conversation thing has no point at all. Like the verb 'wibble' or a North Korean election it is, I am afraid, utterly meaningless.

It joins Max Factor's appointment of new brand Ambassador Marilyn Monroe (dead since 1962), Nigel Farage's declaration of momentary teetotalarism (dead behind the eyes since 1964) and David Cameron's Road To Nowhere poster (I preferred the song) in a week that seems to be celebrating The New Meaningless as if it were the new black. Or brown. Or whatever meaningless fashion cycle we are currently in.

So before I rip off my thong and sing you an Aria here's a note to Ed: 

We don't need a conversation. It's a waste of time. Labour needs leadership. Britain needs leadership. It needs someone who will stand up and have a fight and take some blows and throw some better punches in return. It needs a leader who will conjure up surprises and a road to somewhere and even some slightly left field eye catching but tangible ideas that will speak to progressive voters and people who might stop and think again and look beyond you and your ridiculous bacon sandwich.

Wibble?

It won't happen of course, because politics now sits where Derek Zoolander and friends have been reclining these past 50 years. In a nest of meaninglessness - atop a Froop tree.

A conversation with 4 million people my big fat arse. You might just as well go about the place telling complete strangers you love them.

Which I do by the way. I really, really do.